Skip to content

AI vendor transparency index

Aon Assessment Solutions: documentation transparency entry

What Aon Assessment Solutions publishes about the validity and fairness of its scores, assessed against eight criteria covering published documentation only.

Headquarters: Hamburg, Germany, within Aon plc
Assessed: Video interview and psychometric assessment, including vidAssess-AI, ADEPT-15 and gridChallenge.
Rubric: version 1. Search protocol applied and all sources accessed: 2026-09-22.

Documented 0, partial 3, absent 5, of eight criteria. This records what is published about the validity and fairness of the scores. It is not an assessment of the product, the model or the underlying science.

D 0% P 37.5% A 62.5%
#CriterionLevel
C1Technical manual or validity report publicly available without a sales conversationA
C2Validity coefficients reported with sample size and uncertaintyA
C3Adverse impact reported by named subgroupA
C4Scored construct named and defined, not described only by outcomeP
C5Evidence of comparability across languages, versions or delivery modesP
C6Human oversight documented, with a candidate route to contest a scoreP
C7Independent review named and the reviewer identifiedA
C8Reliability reported, and reported by groupA

C1. Technical manual or validity report publicly available without a sales conversation

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

Model cards for the assessments exist but were found published by a third party rather than by the vendor.

C2. Validity coefficients reported with sample size and uncertainty

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

C3. Adverse impact reported by named subgroup

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

C4. Scored construct named and defined, not described only by outcome

Partial.

"ADEPT-15" is named as a validated personality model of "15 behavioural dimensions"; measurement areas are listed as "Abstract Logical Ability", "Cognitive Ability", "Numerical Ability", "Language Proficiency" and "Verbal Ability".

Source: https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

The personality model and its dimensions are named. No individual construct is defined publicly.

C5. Evidence of comparability across languages, versions or delivery modes

Partial.

"Our flexible technology allows easy translations of the job simulations"

Source: https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

Translation of the instruments is described as a process. No evidence of score comparability across the resulting versions is published.

C6. Human oversight documented, with a candidate route to contest a score

Partial.

"Hiring managers then review the report and can confirm or amend the results"

Source: https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

A reviewer route is described. No candidate-facing route to query or contest a score was found.

C7. Independent review named and the reviewer identified

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).

C8. Reliability reported, and reported by group

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://www.aon.com/en/capabilities/talent-and-rewards/talent-assessment-products-and-tools (accessed 2026-09-22).


Absent records the outcome of the published search protocol on 2026-09-22. Where a source is supplied that the search did not reach, the cell is re-scored under the corrections policy, with the date of the change recorded and the previous level retained.

Back to the index, the rubric and the methods note

Other vendors assessed