Headquarters: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Assessed: Game-based behavioural and cognitive assessment.
Rubric: version 1. Search protocol applied and all sources accessed: 2026-09-22.
Documented 0, partial 3, absent 5, of eight criteria. This records what is published about the validity and fairness of the scores. It is not an assessment of the product, the model or the underlying science.
| # | Criterion | Level |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | Technical manual or validity report publicly available without a sales conversation | A |
| C2 | Validity coefficients reported with sample size and uncertainty | A |
| C3 | Adverse impact reported by named subgroup | P |
| C4 | Scored construct named and defined, not described only by outcome | P |
| C5 | Evidence of comparability across languages, versions or delivery modes | A |
| C6 | Human oversight documented, with a candidate route to contest a score | A |
| C7 | Independent review named and the reviewer identified | P |
| C8 | Reliability reported, and reported by group | A |
C1. Technical manual or validity report publicly available without a sales conversation
Absent.
No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.
Pages examined include https://www.equalture.com/science/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
C2. Validity coefficients reported with sample size and uncertainty
Absent.
No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.
Pages examined include https://www.equalture.com/science/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
No coefficient is published on the vendor pages.
C3. Adverse impact reported by named subgroup
Partial.
"Every game is validated for adverse impact – scores are tested across demographic groups and candidates with neurological conditions to check for bias before assessments go live."
Source: https://www.equalture.com/faq/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
No group is named and no figure is published.
C4. Scored construct named and defined, not described only by outcome
Partial.
"cognitive abilities" and "behaviour" are named as the predictors.
Source: https://www.equalture.com/science/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
Categories are named rather than individual constructs.
C5. Evidence of comparability across languages, versions or delivery modes
Absent.
No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.
Pages examined include https://www.equalture.com/science/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
C6. Human oversight documented, with a candidate route to contest a score
Absent.
No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.
Pages examined include https://www.equalture.com/faq/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
C7. Independent review named and the reviewer identified
Partial.
"Dr. Marcia Goddard, Expert in the field of neuroscience and game-based assessments"
Source: https://www.equalture.com/science/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
The named expert provides commentary. No independent review of the vendor tools is presented.
C8. Reliability reported, and reported by group
Absent.
No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.
Pages examined include https://www.equalture.com/science/ (accessed 2026-09-22).
Absent records the outcome of the published search protocol on 2026-09-22. Where a source is supplied that the search did not reach, the cell is re-scored under the corrections policy, with the date of the change recorded and the previous level retained.
Back to the index, the rubric and the methods note