Skip to content

AI vendor transparency index

Cammio: documentation transparency entry

What Cammio publishes about the validity and fairness of its scores, assessed against eight criteria covering published documentation only.

Headquarters: The Hague, Netherlands
Assessed: Video interviewing platform with AI-assisted screening features.
Rubric: version 1. Search protocol applied and all sources accessed: 2026-09-22.

Documented 0, partial 0, absent 8, of eight criteria. This records what is published about the validity and fairness of the scores. It is not an assessment of the product, the model or the underlying science.

D 0% P 0% A 100%
#CriterionLevel
C1Technical manual or validity report publicly available without a sales conversationA
C2Validity coefficients reported with sample size and uncertaintyA
C3Adverse impact reported by named subgroupA
C4Scored construct named and defined, not described only by outcomeA
C5Evidence of comparability across languages, versions or delivery modesA
C6Human oversight documented, with a candidate route to contest a scoreA
C7Independent review named and the reviewer identifiedA
C8Reliability reported, and reported by groupA

C1. Technical manual or validity report publicly available without a sales conversation

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).

C2. Validity coefficients reported with sample size and uncertainty

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).

C3. Adverse impact reported by named subgroup

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).

C4. Scored construct named and defined, not described only by outcome

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).

C5. Evidence of comparability across languages, versions or delivery modes

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).

C6. Human oversight documented, with a candidate route to contest a score

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/legal/privacy-policy (accessed 2026-09-22).

The privacy policy does not refer to algorithmic scoring or to automated decision-making.

C7. Independent review named and the reviewer identified

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).

C8. Reliability reported, and reported by group

Absent.

No public source was found for this criterion by the search protocol.

Pages examined include https://cammio.com/prerecorded-interviews (accessed 2026-09-22).


Absent records the outcome of the published search protocol on 2026-09-22. Where a source is supplied that the search did not reach, the cell is re-scored under the corrections policy, with the date of the change recorded and the previous level retained.

Back to the index, the rubric and the methods note

Other vendors assessed